SOCIOCULTURAL SAFETY CONCEPT IN EDUCATIONAL ENVIRONMENT OF UNIVERCITY
Abstract
The article describes the structure of the concept of sociocultural safety (SCS) of the educational environment of university, examines approaches to its assessment from the standpoint of the current state of the pedagogical and psychological sciences. The main components of the SCS are presented and described: preservation and development of culture; human development as understood by the UN; resilience, understood both in a narrow sense (as a subjectivity) and broadly, as a set of personal and social factors that enable a person to overcome life's difficulties, recover and move towards the achievement oftraditional personal values; competent actions of the authorities and representatives of ethno cultures themselves, which is consistent with local and global trends in the formation and preservation of cultures of ethnic groups.
References
1. Банщикова Т. Н. Кросс-культурный подход в системе методологических подходов к исследованию проблемы психической регуляции // Материалы V Международной научно-практической конференции «Личностный ресурс субъекта труда в изменяющейся России». Часть 1. Пятигорск: Научный мир, 2018. С. 39-45.
2. Зинченко Ю. П. Методологические проблемы психологии безопасности. Личность, общество, государство: монография. М.: МГУ, 2011. 952 с.
3. Конопкин О. А. Психическая саморегуляция произвольной активности человека (структурно-функциональный аспект) // Вопросы психологии. 1995. № 1. С. 5-12.
4. Молокоедов А. В., Слободчиков И. М., Франц С. В. Психологическая безопасность личности: основы комплексного анализа. М.: Левъ, 2017. 176 с.
5. Соломонов В. А., Фомина Е. А. Совладающее поведение иностранных студентов: социокультурный аспект // Материалы V Международной научно-практической конференции «Личностный ресурс субъекта труда в изменяющейся России». Пятигорск: Научный мир, 2018. С. 239-246.
6. Bamblett M., Harrison J., & Lewis P. Proving culture and voice works: Towards creating the evidence base for resilient Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children in Australia // International Journal of Child and Family Welfare. 2010. № 13 (1-2). С. 98-113.
7. Bennett W. Community Security handbook. London: Saferworld. Retrieved, 2014. URL: www.saferworld. org.uk.
8. Frankland R., Bamblett M., & Lewis P. Forever Business: A Framework for Maintaining and Restoring Cultural Safety in Aboriginal Victoria // Indigenous Law Bulletin. 2011. June 7(24). Р. 27-30.
9. Goller M. Human Agency at Work: An Active Approach towards Expertise Development (1st ed.). Wiesbaden, Germany: Springer VS, 2017.
10. UngarM. The social ecology of resilience: Addressing contextual and cultural ambiguity of a nascent construct// American Journal of Orthopsychiatry. 2011. № 81(1). Р. 1-17. URL: https:/ 10.1177/1049731511428619/ doi.org/10/ck342n.
11. Liebenberg L., Ungar M., Vjver F. V. de. Validation of the Child and Youth Resilience Measure-28 (CYRM-28) Among Canadian Youth // Research on Social Work Practice. 2012. Vol. 22, № 2. P. 219-226.
12. United Nations Development Programme. Human Development Report 2016: Human Development for Everyone. 2017. UN. URL: https://doi.org/10.18356/b6186701-en.
13. William Stanner. The Dreaming & Other Essays. Black Inc. Agenda. 2011.
14. Wright M., & Masten A. Pathways to Resilience in Context. In Youth resilience and culture: commonalities and complexities New York: Springer, 2014. P. 3-22.
Review
For citations:
Sokolovskii M. SOCIOCULTURAL SAFETY CONCEPT IN EDUCATIONAL ENVIRONMENT OF UNIVERCITY. Newsletter of North-Caucasus Federal University. 2018;(6):241-247. (In Russ.)
Views:
118
Email this article 