Preview

Newsletter of North-Caucasus Federal University

Advanced search

Urban Entrepreneurial Stratum as an Indicator of Political System Resilience: Lessons from Iran for Central Asia

https://doi.org/10.37493/2307-907X.2026.3.11

Abstract

Introduction. Against the backdrop of accelerating urbanization and the transformation of economic models, the urban entrepreneurial stratum emerges as a key social actor. Its economic behavior and social sentiments directly reflect the effectiveness of state governance and macroeconomic stability, serving as a critical marker of the socio-political resilience.
Goal. The study analyzes the role of the urban entrepreneurial stratum as a structural indicator of political system resilience under conditions of institutional transformation and socio-economic change.
Materials and methods. The study is based on an interdisciplinary approach synthesizing Max Weber’s concepts of legitimacy, Karl Polanyi’s «embeddedness» of the market, and Theda Skocpol’s structural theory of revolutions. The empirical basis includes a comparative analysis of Iran’s historical experience, as well as modern socio-economic processes in Central Asian countries, Afghanistan and Iraq.
Results and discussion. It is established that the loyalty of entrepreneurs is determined by institutional predictability and the protection of their economic interests, while their discontent signals a crisis in state governance. The Iranian case demonstrates how the restriction of “bazaar” autonomy led to its participation in the 1979 revolution, while subsequent economic monopolization by quasi-state structures provoked the erosion of business loyalty. Analysis of Central Asian countries reveals regional features: dependence on migration flows and informal networks reduces the likelihood of political mobilization by redirecting social pressure abroad, yet makes entrepreneurs a sensitive indicator of institutional maturity.
Conclusion. The urban entrepreneurial stratum serves as a universal barometer of state governance quality. For Central Asian states, maintaining a balance between state control and the economic autonomy of business is a key condition for long-term stability and the successful modernization of political systems.

About the Author

Sh. Maksudzoda
State Unitary Enterprise «Tajiksughurta»
Tajikistan

Shukhrat Maksudzoda – Lead Specialist

Researcher ID: ODM-3029-2025

8-60, М. Tursunzoda str., Dushanbe, 734000, Republic of Tajikistan



References

1. Keddie N. Modern Iran: Roots and Results of Revolution. 2nd ed. New Haven: Yale University Press; 2006.

2. Harris S. The Iran Primer: Power, Politics, and U.S. Policy. Washington, D. C.: United States Institute of Peace; 2017.

3. Weber M. Economy and Society. Moscow: Ekonomika; 1978.

4. Polanyi K. The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time. Moscow: Progress; 2001 (first published 1944).

5. Skocpol T. States and Social Revolutions: A Comparative Analysis of France, Russia, and China. Moscow: Progress; 1979.

6. Arjomand SA. The Turban for the Crown: The Islamic Revolution in Iran. New York: Oxford University Press; 1988.

7. Mottahedeh R. The Mantle of the Prophet: Religion and Politics in Iran. New York: Oneworld Publications; 2000.

8. Rubin BR. The Fragmentation of Afghanistan: State Formation and Collapse in the International System. New Haven: Yale University Press; 2002.

9. Goodhand J. From Wars to Complex Emergencies: Understanding Civil War and the Political Economy of Conflict in Afghanistan. Journal of Conflict Studies. 2004.

10. Kurdistani HM. The Political Economy of Iraq: Restoring Balance in a Post-Conflict Society. New York: Palgrave Macmillan; 2013.

11. Landers R. The Political Economy of the Reconstruction of Iraq: From Government Control to Governance and the Market. Journal of Global Policy and Governance. 2009.

12. Hibo B. The Political Economy of the Middle East: The Challenges of Globalization and Economic Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2015.

13. Trost S. The Political Economy of Statebuilding: A Critique of the Theory and Practice of Statebuilding. International Political Science Review. 2005.

14. World Bank. Labor Migration in Central Asia: Impacts on the Economy. Washington, D. C.; 2019.

15. World Bank. Central Asia's Trade and Development Strategy: Harnessing Regional Integration for Growth. Washington, D. C.; 2019.

16. Gigenhagen O, Sharshenov A. The Political Economy of Central Asia. Palgrave Macmillan; 2014.

17. Laff E, Stevenson R. Trade Networks and Business in Central Asia: Informal Practices and Political Economy. Asian Journal of Comparative Politics. 2016;2(2):151-164.

18. World Bank. Doing Business 2020. Washington, D. C.; 2020.

19. Mason J. Corruption, Bureaucracy, and Economic Reform in Central Asia. London: Routledge; 2010.

20. Makhmudova S. “State Control and Bureaucratic Challenges for Entrepreneurs in Central Asia.” Central Asian Economic Review. 2018;12(1):45-60.

21. International Finance Corporation (IFC). Challenges of Small and Medium Business Development in Central Asia. Washington, D. C.: IFC, 2017.


Review

For citations:


Maksudzoda Sh. Urban Entrepreneurial Stratum as an Indicator of Political System Resilience: Lessons from Iran for Central Asia. Newsletter of North-Caucasus Federal University. 2026;(3):103–109. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.37493/2307-907X.2026.3.11

Views: 4

JATS XML


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2307-907X (Print)