Study of inter-industry differentiation of labor productivity under the conditions of economy restructuring.
https://doi.org/10.37493/2307-907X.2025.6.11
Abstract
Introduction. In recent years, Russian economy has been firmly resisting the coordinated isolation strategies of the Western bloc, creating new ties and seeking opportunities for economic development. Institutional and structural factors are becoming key not only for the Russian economic system, but also for many countries in the world. Stimulating the growth of labor productivity is a priority task, since other sources of growth have become unavailable to the economy due to the pressure of sanctions. Studying the possibilities based on structural shifts without attracting additional resources can become a reliable basis for the competitive development of industries. Goal. To study the regional specifics and depth of intersectoral differentiation in labor productivity based on a comparative assessment of its level by type of economic activity in comparison with the national average. Materials and methods. The study was conducted using official statistical data, economic statistical analysis, comparative analysis, and rankings. Results and discussion. The study of the industry structure showed emerging strong structural shifts, structural flows of labor resources from potentially highly productive industries to low-productivity ones, which is dangerous in terms of the quality and speed of economic growth. In the Russian Federation and the regions, the highest growth index is characteristic of financial and insurance activities, although the share in the industry structure is the lowest. Degradation processes in the dynamics of high-performance jobs are noted, which also slow down regional economic growth. A comparative assessment of the level of labor productivity in the industry complexes of the regions showed a significant increase in the level of inter-industry differentiation. Also, the average Russian wage level exceeds the regional level by 20-75%. The analysis helped to identify failing industries in which productivity in terms of growth rates is inferior to the average nominal wage. Conclusion. Conclusions are substantiated about the undervaluation of labor in the regions, which negatively affects the possibilities of increasing labor productivity. It has been established that industry complexes that form the industry specialization of regions cannot be a platform for accelerated growth in labor productivity. Systemic measures to reduce the differentiation of labor productivity in the regions are in demand.
About the Authors
E. I. KrivokoraРоссия
Evgeniya I. Krivokora – Cand. Sci. (Econ), Associate Professor of the Department of Public, Municipal Administration and Labor Economics
A. Yu. Kalnaya
Россия
Anastasia Yu. Kalnaya – Cand. Sci. (Econ), Associate Professor of the Department of Public, Municipal Administration and Labor Economics
E. A. Astakhova
Россия
Elena A. Astakhova – Cand. Sci. (Econ), Associate Professor of the Department of Public, Municipal Administration and Labor Economics
References
1. Mironov V, Kuznetsov A. Labor productivity: new trends, old problems. Institute "Development Center" of the National Research University Higher School of Economics, 2022. Available from: https://www.finam.ru/publications/item/proizvoditelnost-truda-novye-tendencii-starye-problemy-20210831-163800/ [Accessed 24 July 2024]. (In Russ.).
2. Timmer MP, Inklaar R, O’Mahony M, Ark B. Productivity and Economic Growth in Europe: A Comparative Industry Perspective. International Productivity Monitor. 2011;(21):3-23.
3. Auzina-Emsina A. Labour Productivity, Economic Growth and Global Competitiveness in Post-Crisis Period. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2014;(156):317-321.
4. Andrews D, Criscuolo Ch, Gal P. The Best versus the Rest: The Global Productivity Slowdown, Divergence across Firms and the Role of Public Policy. OECD Productivity Working Papers. 2016;(5):77.
5. Zaitsev AA. Cross-country differences in labor productivity: the role of capital, technology level and natural rent. Economic Issues. 2016;9(9):67-93. (In Russ.).
6. Masych MA, Panichkina MV. Trends and patterns of socio-economic development of Russia and foreign countries from the standpoint of labor productivity. Scientific and technical statements of St. Petersburg State Polytechnical University. Economic sciences. 2017;10(6):50-63. (In Russ.).
7. Balatsky EV, Ekimova NA. Russia in the global system of labor productivity. The world of the new economy. 2019;13(3):14-28. (In Russ.).
8. Syverson Ch. Challenges to Mismeasurement Explanations for the US Productivity Slowdown. Journal of Economic Perspectives. 2017;31(2):165-186.
9. Kaasa A. Intangible factors and productivity: Evidence from Europe at the regional level. Business and Economic Horizons. 2018;14(2):300-325.
10. Merkulova EYu. The impact of labor productivity on economic growth. Statistics and Economics. 2019;16(2):34-44. (In Russ.).
11. Lavrovsky BL. Productivity trends in the world and Russia. Forecasting problems. 2015;(3):104-113. (In Russ.).
12. Balatsky EV, Ekimova NA. Interregional structural factor of labor productivity growth in Russia. The world of the new economy. 2019;13(3):90-102. (in Russ.).
13. Bessonova EV. Analysis of the dynamics of total factor productivity at Russian enterprises (2009-2015). Economic Issues. 2018;(7):96-118. (In Russ.).
14. Bufetova AN. Spatial aspects of labor productivity dynamics in Russia. Mir Ekonomiki i Managemeniya. 2017;17(4):142 157. (In Russ.).
15. Zaitsev A. Regional diagnostics and sectoral analysis of labor productivity. Federalism. 2013;1(69):57-74. (In Russ.).
16. Mikheeva NN. Comparative analysis of labor productivity in Russian regions. Region: Economics and Sociology. 2015;86(2):86-112. (In Russ.).
17. Dementyev VE. The productivity paradox in the regional dimension. Regional Economy. 2019;15(1):43-56. (In Russ.).
18. Nagaeva OS, Popodko GI. Comparative analysis of labor productivity in resource and non-resource regions of Russia. Labor Economics. 2019;16(10):1914-1927. Available from: https://1economic.ru/lib/41271. (In Russ.).
19. Kozyr NA, Kovalenko VS. Industrial classification metrics in the Russian Federation and abroad. Economic analysis: theory and practice. 2017;6(4):1299-1316. (In Russ.).
20. On the Concept of Long-Term Socioeconomic Development of the Russian Federation through 2020: Order of the Govern ment of the Russian Federation of 17.11.2008 No. 1662-r (as amended on 28.09.2018). Available from: https://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_82134/28c7f9e359e8af09d7244d8033c66928fa27e527/ [Accessed 24 July 2024]
21. On Long-Term State Economic Policy: Decree of the President of the Russian Federation of 07.05.2012 No. 596. Available from: https://base.garant.ru/70170954/ [Accessed 24 July 2024].
22. Nikolaev IA, Marchenko TE. Labor productivity: tasks, calculation features, comparisons. Moscow: FBK Institute for Strategic Analysis, 2018. (in Russian) Available from: https://www.fbk.ru/upload/medialibrary/bfc/Analiticheskaya%20zapiska_Proizvoditelnost_truda_f.pdf [Accessed 24 July 2024].
23. On National Goals and Strategic Objectives for the Development of the Russian Federation through 2024: Decree of the Pres ident of the Russian Federation of May 7, 2018, No. 204. Available from: https://base.garant.ru/71937200/ [Accessed 24 July 2024].
24. Labor Productivity and Employment Support: Passport of the national project (program) (approved by the Presidium of the Presidential Council for Strategic Development and National Projects, Minutes No. 16 of December 24, 2018). Available from: https://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_319210/ [Accessed 24 July 2024].
25. Shcherbakov AI. Labor productivity as an economic category and a generalized indicator of efficiency. Social and labor studies. 2022;48(3):27-34. (in Russ.).
26. Shcherbakov AI. Measuring labor productivity. Social and labor studies. 2023;(3):80-87. (In Russ.).
27. Labor productivity. Wikipedia. Available from: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Productivity [Accessed 24 July 2024]
28. Burtseva TA, Frenkel AA, Tikhomirov BI, Surkov AA. Integral index – an effective tool for measuring regional labor productivity. Labor Economics. 2020;7(11):1085-1102. (In Russ.).
29. On Approval of the Methodology for Calculating Labor Productivity Indicators of an Enterprise, Industry, or Subject of the Russian Federation and the Methodology for Calculating Certain Indicators of the National Project "Labor Productivity and Employment Support": Order of the Ministry of Economic Development of the Russian Federation dated 28.12.2018 No. 748. Available from: https://www.economy.gov.ru/material/dokumenty/prikaz_minekonomrazvitiya_rossii_ot_28_dekabrya_2018_g_748.html [Accessed 24 July 2024].
30. EMISS (Unified Interdepartmental Information and Statistical System). Official Statistical Indicators. Available from: https://www.fedstat.ru/ [Accessed 24 July 2024].
Review
For citations:
Krivokora E.I., Kalnaya A.Yu., Astakhova E.A. Study of inter-industry differentiation of labor productivity under the conditions of economy restructuring. Newsletter of North-Caucasus Federal University. 2025;(6):98-113. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.37493/2307-907X.2025.6.11
JATS XML























