The research of individual macroeconomic effects of the impact of innovative entrepreneurship on economic growth in BRICS countries
https://doi.org/10.37493/2307-907X.2024.1.11
Abstract
Introduction. This article is devoted to the study of individual macroeconomic effects of the impact of innovative entrepreneurship on economic growth in the fast-growing BRICS member countries. Despite the fact that innovative entrepreneurship has recently attracted a lot of attention in theoretical and methodological aspects due to its enormous impact on economic growth in technologically leading countries, there are few in-depth empirical studies that pay sufficient attention to the explicit relationship between innovative entrepreneurship and economic growth in new countries, forming a system of neo-global equilibrium and economic growth in the global economy.
Goal. The purpose of this article is to explore the potential relationship between innovative entrepreneurship and economic growth, focusing on the fast-growing economies of BRICS countries (Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa).
Materials and methods. The study uses analytical data for the period from 2002 to 2022 and a number of econometric tools for macroeconomic assessment, including the combined least squares model, fixed effects, generalized least squares and two-stage least squares methods.
Results and discussion. The results of the empirical analysis show that innovative entrepreneurship has a positive and signifycant impact on economic growth in the BRICS countries. Similarly, the openness of trade and the growth of physical capital stocks also contributed to overall economic growth.
Conclusion. A positive relationship between human capital and economic growth has been revealed, which is statistically significant for the economies of the BRICS countries. Finally, the verification of the causal relationship revealed a one-sided relationship directed from innovative entrepreneurship to economic growth.
About the Author
B. D. Matrizaev
Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Bahadyr D. Matrizaev - Cand. Sci. (Econ.), Associate Professor, Department of Economic Theory
Researcher ID: F-5364-2019,
Author ID: 380043
49, Leningradsky Avenue, Moscow, 125993
References
1. Smith A. A study on the nature and causes of the wealth of nations (books I-III). Translated from English. V. Izergin. M., 2017. (In Russ)
2. Dabkowski AP. Entrepreneurship and Economic Growth: An Investigation into the Relationship between Entrepreneurship and Total Factor Productivity Growth in the EU. CASE Network Studies and Analyses 427. CASE-Center for Social and Economic Research. 2011. RePEc: sec:cnstan:0427.
3. McCarthy N, Doran J, O' Connor M. The role of entrepreneurship in stimulating economic growth in developed and developing countries. Cogent Economics & Finance. 2018;6(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2018.1442093
4. Xu G, Wang R. The effect of foreign direct investment on domestic capital formation, trade, and economic growth in a transition economy: evidence from China. Global Economy Journal. 2007. No. 7. 1850107.
5. Stoica O, Roman A, Rusu V-D. The Nexus between Entrepreneurship and Economic Growth: A Comparative Analysis on Groups of Countries. February Sustainability. 2020;12(3):1186. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12031186
6. Matrizaev BD. Macro strategies of innovative development and global economic growth: Macroeconomic analysis, trends, forecasts. Moscow, 2018. (In Russ).
7. Matrizaev BD. Brixelevenomics: a study of the principles of formation of neo-global equilibrium and economic growth. Teoreticheskaya ekonomika = Theoretical economics. 2022;10(94):115-131. (In Russ.).
8. International Labour Organization. Available from: https://www.ilo.org/global/lang--en/index.htm. [Accessed 16 October 2023].
9. GEM Global Entrepreneurship Monitor. Available from: https://www.gemconsortium.org/ [Accessed 16 October 2023].
10. Global Innovation Index. Soumitra Dutta, INSEAD Editor. 2011-2023. Available from: https://www.globalinnova-tionindex.org. [Accessed 16 October 2023].
11. Savrul M. The impact of entrepreneurship on economic growth: gem data analysis. Economics, Business. 2017. 30 September. https://doi.org/10.17261/PRESSACADEMIA.2017.494 Corpus ID: 158657511.
12. Wennekers S., Stel A. V. Types and Roles of Productive Entrepreneurship. The Wiley Handbook of Entrepreneurship, 2017. P. 37-69. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118970812.ch3
13. Teran-Yepez E, Fuente AB. Sustainable entrepreneurship as a key economic driver of change for SME in developing and least-developed countries. Revista de Ciencias Sociales 2023;29(3):17-24. https://doi.org/10.31876/rcs.v29i3.40692
14. Lopes JM, Gomes S. Innovative and Sustainable Business Strategies: The Case of Portuguese SMEs. IBIMA Business Review. 2022. July. https://doi.org/10.5171/2022.714613
15. Smith D. The role of entrepreneurship in economic growth. Undergrad. Econ. Rev. 2010;6(1):7. School of public policy and administration university of Delaware. Available from: http://www.sppa.udel.edu/nvpa/home. [Accessed 16 October 2023].
Review
For citations:
Matrizaev B.D. The research of individual macroeconomic effects of the impact of innovative entrepreneurship on economic growth in BRICS countries. Newsletter of North-Caucasus Federal University. 2024;(1):108-117. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.37493/2307-907X.2024.1.11
Views:
229
Email this article 