Identification of polynomial models of static load characteristics based on passive experiment results

Introduction. Dependence of a load power from a voltage in the form of static load characteristics permits to improve the accuracy of regime calculations significantly. This fact is extremely important, when it is necessary to define the area of permissible operating regimes for power systems. The most technologically advanced approach to collect data for the static load characteristics identification is a passive experiment, but the statistical processing of data does not allow for the polynomial models identification. The problems in the statistical processing connect with the small range of voltage variations in a passive experiment and an influence of grid responsiveness to the voltage on load busses.

Goal - development of a technique that allows to determine polynomial models of static characteristics in terms of voltage from linear models.

Materials and methods. In the paper, the technique based on the initial identification of the linear model, defined by EM-algorithm, and continued by the Lagrange multiplier method optimization with iterations by the Newton method is suggested.

Results and discussion. As a result, for the large industrial consumer the polynomial models of the static load characteristics have been obtained. The polynomial model coefficients are installed into the software for regime calculations, and, then, the regime modeling with serial changes of active and reactive power nominal values, recording calculated values of powers on load busses and the comparison with standard models of static load characteristics are completed.

Conclusion. The dispersion of initial data in reference to calculated data shows, that polynomial models of static load characteristics, identified by suggested technique, simulate the regime with the greater accuracy than standard models of static load characteristics.

1. Milanovic JV, Yamashita K, Martinez Villanueva S, Djokic SZ, Korunovic LM. International industry practice on power system load modeling. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems. 2013;28(3):3038-3046.

2. Dmitriev SA, Semenenko SI, Suvorov AA. Complex load bus static load characteristics determination using passive experiment method. 17th International Ural Conference on AC Electric Drives, ACED 2018. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc. 2018;2018:1-6. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACED.2018.8341711.

3. Tavlintsev AS, Suvorov AA. Statistically equilibrium states of load in the problem of static load characteristics identification. Vestnik YUzhno-Ural'skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta = Bulletin of the South Ural State University. Ser. Power Engineering. 2017;17(2):23-28. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.14529/power170203.

4. Chen F, Liu H-T, Huang Z, Zhang X-J. Probabilistic load model based on improved k-means clustering algorithm. Dianli Xitong Baohu yu Kongzhi. Power System Protection and Control. 2013;41:128-133.

5. Karpio K, Lukasiewicz P, Nafkha R. Regression Technique for Electricity Load Modeling and Outlined Data Points Explanation. International Multi-Conference on Advanced Computer Systems, ACS 2018. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing. 2018;889:56-67.

6. Konovalov YS, Kugelevichus IB. On the Possibility of Determining the Static Characteristics of the Load by Methods of Mathematical Statistics. Elektrichestvo = Electricity. 1968;3:11-13. (In Russ.).

7. Gurevich YE, Libova LE. On the determination of the voltage load characteris-tics by the method of passive experiment. Elektrichestvo = Electricity. 1972;2:21-24. (In Russ.).

8. Hossan MS, Mesbah Maruf HM, Chowdhury B. Comparison of the ZIP load model and the exponential load model for CVR factor evaluation. 2017 IEEE Power & Energy Society General Meeting; 2017. P. 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1109/PESGM.2017.8274490.

9. Ram S, Daram S, Venkataramu PS, Nagaraj M. Analysis of exponential and polynomial load models using New- ton-Raphson method with hybrid power flow controller. International Journal of Control and Automation. 2018;11(11):43-56. https://doi.org/10.14257/ijca.2018.11.11.04.

10. Pankratov AV, Batseva NL, Polyakova ES, Tavlintsev AS, Lapatin IL, Lipnitskiy IY. Application of expectation maximization algorithm for measurement-based power system load modeling. In 2019 International Siberian Conference on Control and Communications (SIBCON April 2019). Tomsk; 2019. P. 1-5.

11. Tavlintsev AS. Development of methods of static characteristics of complex load node identification: dissertation ... Cand. Sci. (Technology). Ekaterinburg, 2018. 172 p.: il.

12. Rodriguez-Garcia L, Perez-Londono S, Mora-Florez J. Measurement-based exponential recovery load model: Development and validation. DYNA. 2015;82:131-140.

13. Vorontsov KV, Potapenko AA. Modifications of the EM-algorithm for probabilistic thematic modeling. Mash- innoe obuchenie i analiz dannyh = Machine Learning and Data Analysis. 2013;1(6):657-686. (In Russ.).

14. Batseva NL, Zhuykov AK. Method of the experiment data processing for the polynomial static load characteristics identification. XXVI International Conference on Soft Computing and Measurments (SCM'2023) 24-26 May 2023. Tomsk: National Research Tomsk Polytechnic University; 2023. Vol. 1. P. 20-24.

15. Pankratov AV, Batseva NL, Zhuykov AK, Shuvalova AA, Kondrashov MA. Processing technique of telemetry from an operative-information complex for the identification of static load characteristiks by an active experiment. Vestnik PNIPU. Elektrotehnika, informacionnye tehnologii, sistemy upravleniya = Perm National Research Polytechnic University Bulletin. Electrotechnics, information technologies, control systems. 2021;39:5-33. (In Russ.).

16. Batseva NL, Pankratov AV, Zhuykov AK. Software for the identification of a load model by arrays, measured by passive experiment. XXI vek: itogi proshlogo i problemy nastoyashchego plyus = XXI century: Resumes of the Past and Challenges of the Present plus. 2022;11(3(59)):51-56. (In Russ.).

17. Sugar CA, James GM. Finding the Number of Clusters in a Dataset. Journal of the American Statistical Association. 2003;98:750-763.

18. Trench WF. The Method of Lagrange Multipliers. Research Gate. Texas, USA: Book; 2012. 31 p.

19. Givens GH, Hoeting JA. Computational Statistics. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons; 2013. P. 24-58.

20. Hansbo P, Lovadina C, Perugia I, Sangalli GA. Lagrange multiplier method for the finite element solution of elliptic interface problems using non-matching meshes. Math. 2005;100:91-115.

21. Wang Y, Solomon JM. Intrinsic and extrinsic operators for shape analysis. Handbook of Numerical Analysis. 2019;20:41-115.