Preview

Newsletter of North-Caucasus Federal University

Advanced search

APPROACHES TO THE INTRODUCTION OF THE CONCEPT INDUSTRY 4.0. AMERICAN AND GERMAN PLATFORMS

Abstract

The modern world is at the stage of the fourth industrial revolution, called Industry 4.0. Given the high, fundamental importance of digital technologies, software, and the complementary work of complex systems, the emergence of platforms to ensure the effective operation of these processes has become inevitable. To date, there are two main approaches, two main platforms that meet the requirements of the new production paradigm, German RAMI Industry 4.0 and the American IIRA Industrial Internet Consortium (Industrial Internet Consortium). These platforms advocate seemingly different conceptual conditions that are reflected, on the one hand, in the careful observance of standards, and on the other hand, following innovative, free ideas in realizing the principles of Industry 4.0 in practice. Regarding the procedures that must be followed for future production and the Internet of things, the differences between approaches in Germany and the US may not be noticeable, but they definitely are. Two conceptual approaches and two diferent architecture of building processes at this stage of the fourth industrial revolution afect the development of all technological development. In this article, we analyzed the relationship of these platforms with each other in terms of technological development in general.

About the Authors

K. Mukhin
Saint-Petersburg state University of Economics
Russian Federation


Y. Antokhina
Saint-Petersburg state University of Economics
Russian Federation


References

1. Ахметов К. Взаимодействие человека и компьютера: тенденции, исследования, будущее // Форсайт. 2015. Т. 7. № 2. С. 58-68. URL: https://foresight-journal.hse.ru/2013-7-2/87082096.html.

2. Бауман З. Идет ли богатство немногих на пользу всем прочим? М.: Институт Гайдара, 2017. 112 c.

3. Белкина Г. Л., Корсаков С. Н. И. Т. Фролов и становление отечественной биоэтики // Биоэтика и гуманитарная экспертиза. 2015. № 2. С. 18-54.

4. Бобков В. Н., Квачев В. Г., Щербакова О. И. Нобелевский лауреат Ангус Дитон и развитие российской науки: исследования уровня и качества жизни, методы оценки и измерения неравенства и бедности // Уровень жизни населения регионов России. 2015. № 4 (198). С. 7-26.

5. Kagermann H. Recommendations for Implementing the Strategic Initiative INDUSTRIE 4.0: Securing the Future of Germa Manufacturing Industry. Final report of the Industrie 4.0 Working Group, 2013. 84 p.

6. Report of the Industrie 4.0 Working Group, 2013. [Online]. URL: http://www.acatech.de/fileadmin/user_ upload/Baumstruktur_nach_Website/Acatech/root/de/Material_fuer_Sonderseiten/Industrie_4.0/Final_ report__Industrie_4.0_accessible.pdf

7. Buhr D. «Social Innovation Policy for Industry 4.0» 2015. [Online]. URL: http://library.fes.de/pdf-files/ wiso/11479.pdf.

8. Smit J., Kreutzer S., Moeller C. and Carlberg M. «Industry 4.0» 15.02.2016. [Online]. URL:http://www. europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2016/570007/IP_STU(2016)570007_EN.pdf.

9. World Economic Forum «The Future of Jobs: Employment, Skills and Workforce Strategy for the Fourth Industrial Revolution)) 2016. [Online]. URL: http://reports.weforum.org/future-of-jobs-2016


Review

For citations:


Mukhin K., Antokhina Y. APPROACHES TO THE INTRODUCTION OF THE CONCEPT INDUSTRY 4.0. AMERICAN AND GERMAN PLATFORMS. Newsletter of North-Caucasus Federal University. 2019;(1):77-81. (In Russ.)

Views: 126


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2307-907X (Print)